For years, Google stood by the stance that there were little
competitors could do to a website to negatively affect its search engine
rankings. As natural links became more precious and paid links were devalued or
penalized, Google changed their stance slightly on the matter, but still
maintained it wasn't a widespread issue, with Google's Matt Cutts admitting
negative SEO isn't not possible, but it is difficult.
Then came the link disavow tool, which allows webmasters to
disallow paid or low quality links and clean up their backlink profile,
regardless of whether they or a competitor was responsible for pointing those
backlinks at a website.
The change was noticed on the “Can Competitors harm
ranking?” help page at Google Webmaster Tools.
When the page first went online, it simply stated “There’s
nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking or have your site removed from
our index.” Last year, when negative SEO became a lot more common, the wording
was changed to “There's almost nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking
or have your site removed from our index.”
This week, webmasters noticed that the wording was changed
once more, to “Google works hard to stop other webmasters from being able to
harm your ranking or have your site removed from our index.”
This is a clear admission that yes, negative SEO does exist
and it can result in third parties being able to remove competing sites from
the Google search index, or at least negatively impact their search rankings.
While changing the wording is a confirmation for many
webmasters that Google is finally acknowledging the problem, it could also tip
off negative SEO wars between competitors. Some webmasters might not have
engaged in negative SEO for the simple reason that so many people insisted the
problem was next to nonexistent, although those who have been impacted by it
know otherwise. So some unscrupulous webmasters might think nothing of link
bombing competitors with one of those “10,000 backlinks for $20” deals that are
advertised everywhere.
That said, webmasters who might not follow SEO news closely,
or who haven’t had their sites impacted by negative SEO, might never visit that
page and see confirmation that negative SEO is a possible problem. The change
to the page reflecting Google’s new stance on the issue was made very quietly,
and seems limited to just that single page.
It is a step moving forward that Google is acknowledging
that negative SEO is a real problem, but it is also positive that they are also
acknowledging that they are looking at ways to battle the issue.
I read your blog such a nice topic you added in that post and this is an unique information you added.
ReplyDelete